Supreme Court Briefs - Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Added 2021-07-06 17:24:02 +0000 UTCUnfortunately, this video has been demonetized since I discuss abortion. This is not really much of a surprise, but I wanted to also bring up that this is yet another reason why I am so grateful for your donations on here, since this ideally I wouldn't ever have to worry about ad revenue to begin with.
Which other Supreme Court cases should I cover for this series? I plan to pick up production of them in the fall.
Thank you for your continued support!
Comments
I've totally wanted to cover that one for awhile but actually forgot about it! Thanks for suggesting it.
Mr. Beat
2021-07-20 02:04:39 +0000 UTCHi, Mr. Beat, a good case to look at would be Miller v California of 1973, where the Court changed the legal definition of obscene materials.
Chuong Nguyen
2021-07-20 00:51:13 +0000 UTCI have never understood why people aren’t outraged that more half the justices were appointed by presidents (Bush and Trump) that lost the popular vote. How is that Democratic?Darn electoral college!
Naterade
2021-07-10 23:52:53 +0000 UTCI doubt it, but you never know with this Court!
Mr. Beat
2021-07-10 20:39:38 +0000 UTCCrazy to think a Democratic governor signed these restrictions into law! As Bob Dylan once sang, “The times they are a- changin’ “ Do you think there will be a Supreme Court Case about the legality of statewide mask mandates? (Sadly, I am only half kidding)
Naterade
2021-07-10 18:59:22 +0000 UTCyeah kinda a tug of war that likely caused her more stress then it was worth.
Devin Canada
2021-07-08 14:58:14 +0000 UTCInteresting. I think it is revealing how desperately both pro-choice and pro-life people want "Roe" from Roe v. Wade to be on their side.
Mr. Beat
2021-07-08 11:44:32 +0000 UTChttps://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2020/may-web-only/norma-mccorvey-jane-roe-v-wade-friends-tell-story.html
Devin Canada
2021-07-08 04:02:32 +0000 UTCThis is the first ive heard of this but There seems to be doubts on that. it was a death bed confession and she was unable to revew the scene before she died. Interviews have been doctored before and being paid as a speaker is common practice so i doubt she was offered money to change views but only to speek. its possible that she saw a opertunity to switch sides and make money but i really call it iffy. Abby Johnson another pro life leader who used to work for planned parenthood said that she believed McCorvey was a damaged woman who should not have been thrust into the spotlight so quickly after turning against abortion. "I don’t have any problem believing that in the last year of her life that she tried to convince herself abortion was OK. But I know at the end of her life, she did not believe that,"
Devin Canada
2021-07-08 03:07:59 +0000 UTCCan we have a F for Mr. Beat's video for being Demonetized
Waterfort
2021-07-07 17:23:07 +0000 UTCThanks for sharing. I do wonder if they will be overturning this case in the fall.
Mr. Beat
2021-07-07 11:38:27 +0000 UTCAs it turns out, Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey) was no longer pro-life before she died. https://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/the-woman-behind-roe-vs-wade-didnt-change-her-mind-on-abortion-she-was-paid/
Mr. Beat
2021-07-07 11:36:59 +0000 UTCOhh that's a great suggestion that I forgot entirely about.
Mr. Beat
2021-07-07 11:35:52 +0000 UTCI really want to see you do "Ex Parte Bollman" this supreme court case gets my blood boiling but I don't know the full story other then in involed Aaron Burrs plot.
Devin Canada
2021-07-07 03:08:01 +0000 UTCInteresting notes too. Jane Roe is now pro life. Alveda King the niece of Martin Luther King Jr. is considered by some as the leading pro life Advocate.
Devin Canada
2021-07-07 03:01:43 +0000 UTCThe cases ruling is heart braking i think by finding that one clause as reason for the ruling they set up men for being abused. i have heard of cases were a mans child was executed via abortion because of the women braking up, or pressure from her parents and this case took away the mans ability to defend his child if the child is still in the womb. I also find their usesage of the Constitution to be shaky and really bad word play to justify their ruling.
Devin Canada
2021-07-07 02:58:15 +0000 UTCThat one has actually been on my list for awhile!
Mr. Beat
2021-07-06 18:58:00 +0000 UTCNice suggestion
Mr. Beat
2021-07-06 18:57:27 +0000 UTCEngblom v Carey because it's one of the few 3rd amendment cases.
Jack Bartlett
2021-07-06 18:51:41 +0000 UTCHollingsworth v Perry because even though it's about same sex marriage, the real issue is Article III standing. That's something that isn't discussed often in supreme court briefs.
Jack Bartlett
2021-07-06 18:50:52 +0000 UTCI'm sure this is not going to be controversial at all
Tomas
2021-07-06 17:24:47 +0000 UTC
