Newlife 0.3.21
Added 2016-05-05 01:57:00 +0000 UTCHi all, here's version 0.3.21.
The changelog is on the blog at http://splendidostrich.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/newlife-0321.html
The new random event requires you to have a friend with the innocent character type and not be visibly pregnant - I felt that some of the things that happen wouldn't really be appropriate for a girl who's obviously carrying. It's on the weekend slot, same as the "cute cake" event.
The event weight is just 60 so it isn't a high-likelihood one. In fact, I may reduce this further in later versions as this is the sort of event that works best IMO as an unusual surprise, rather than something that appears in most games.
Comments
Hi, I just noticed this one in an alarmingly-long list of posts I'd flagged to reply to. Are you asking for the male-start character to be randomly generated? There isn't a randomisation method for the male part of the player-character so adding one wouldn't be a trivial addition.
Splendid Ostrich
2016-07-13 17:45:54 +0000 UTCprobably going to repost this if a new patch comes and no reply: SUGGESTION: if it isn't a complete and utter PITA: Make the start of male/female start as random normally. Small request as I want to do double random (new game (male) --> fixed).
TSPCFS
2016-05-22 05:28:56 +0000 UTCThere are too many "tells" and removing them would remove much of the enjoyment of having impregnators. For example, another "tell" is if you tell him you're unprotected and he gives you a lie about not getting pregnant from your first time. If anything, I'd like MORE text from them, including gloating in positions/situations other than doggy style, having them attempt to come in you again, poking holes in condoms if you refuse sex without one, etc. Also, for crude impregnators he could be even LESS sly, instead gloating midway through the act and leading to a unique set of "Beg him to pull out" responses.
Brian Wachs
2016-05-18 20:47:18 +0000 UTCHey Ostrich! A quick Impregnator issue: Impregnators are a fantastic concept for a game like this, but they feel a bit too obvious at the moment. Specifically, whenever you choose the "Cup his balls" option with an Impregnator NPC, they will always reveal that they want to come inside the PC, which makes them easily recognizable. Thematically, I feel like an Impregnator's true nature should surprise both the PC AND the player, and shouldn't be revealed until he comes or the PC gets lucky searching through his phone. Guessing whether "Charming Nice Guy Isiah from Dance Class" is the real deal or a lying Impregnator leads to some risky fun, and actually simulates some RL dating scenarios. This is a sim game, after all... Possible Solutions: 1) Remove the "Cup his balls" text where Impregnators mention that they want to leave their gooey sperm in the PC. I feel horrible asking a dev to REMOVE content from their game, but this would address the issue with the least amount of work. Removing the text would also help Charming/Romantic Imprengators slide under the player's radar, making them feel much more sinister if they can successfully trick the PC into sex. 2) Make ANY NPC with the "Hates_Condoms" tag also mention that they want to leave their gooey sperm in the PC (or other variants). When asked to pull out, non-Impregnators might actually do so(or at least attempt to do so), while Impregnators will always fake it. This causes some contextual issues, however, since a man disliking condoms doesn't directly imply that he ALSO wants to come inside. Sorry for the wall of text. I'm excited for the next update! Will keep looking for bugs/text errors, per usual.
Saur
2016-05-18 06:49:36 +0000 UTC
