Gif: WELL TAKEN CARE OF
Added 2024-10-04 16:00:17 +0000 UTC
When the genie offered Joe three wishes, he told her he wanted to be stunningly gorgeous, to meet the love of his life and to be well taken care of financially. The genie waved her hand, Joe felt tingly all over... and he suddenly found himself transformed into a rich tech bro's trophy wife!
This is another gif where I’ve used some AI to enhance the morphing process. I’m really excited about the creative possibilities AI opens up, but your opinion matters most to me. If you guys would prefer I didn't use AI, please let me know! I want my patrons to feel like they're always getting my very best work, and I truly appreciate your support and feedback!
Comments
Thank you! Yeah, I do get freaked out by AI and all of its implications. In some ways I hate it. I think it will put a LOT of people out of work, not just artists. At the same time, it's here and I feel like we can either use it or be left behind. The genie is out of the bottle, like it or not.
Mindi Flyth
2024-10-05 22:46:13 +0000 UTCYou just keep outdoing yourself with these! This might be my new favorite. I LOVE Maddison Fox. Personally, I don't like the existence of AI art for many reasons, but since you've been making great stuff without it for years, I have no problem with you using it. Plus, if it allows you to make TG gifs THIS seamless, then definitely keep it up.
TheRollingWrath888
2024-10-05 09:43:50 +0000 UTCThanks for your take on it.
Mindi Flyth
2024-10-04 20:23:33 +0000 UTCThanks, but I wouldn't actually say AI makes my gifs easier. It sometimes enables me to do some smoother or more elaborate morphs, but I still end up taking just as long tweaking them frame by frame. The process takes as much work as ever, but (I think) the results can be more realistic.
Mindi Flyth
2024-10-04 20:23:00 +0000 UTCI've experimented with Luma, Pika and Haiper. Pika was useful for giving the guys in the "before" a little movement, but lately not so much. Luma can give a good result but it's really unpredictable and lately it takes days to get a result back. Haiper gives you a fraction of a second of something useful and then the image turns into a nightmare. I haven't found anything where it's like, "put in two images and get a flawless TF morph back." It always takes lots of frame by frame tweaking.
Mindi Flyth
2024-10-04 20:09:19 +0000 UTCWow, that's kind of a lot. I won't get into the ethics of gifs like mine, other than to say I consider these transformative works (in the legal sense, not just the secksy TF sense) using public figures, and to clarify that I don't post "adult" gifs on Patreon. I used to, but Patreon introduced content restrictions and now my gifs here feature no nudity, no explicit sexual acts, etc. (My spicier stuff goes on the external site.) I'm not going to show anybody doing stuff they didn't do in the original gif. AI aside, if you feel that way about gifs like mine, I'm not really sure why you're subscribed. I'm honestly not trying to be rude, but it sounds like you have real ethical objections with TF gifs like these.
Mindi Flyth
2024-10-04 20:03:38 +0000 UTCHey if you like what it brings to the finished product and like another said the material isn't solely AI driven do what works for you
Tobias
2024-10-04 17:58:24 +0000 UTCAs long as the idea for the gif came from yourself and not the AI then I say keep on using it even more so if it makes it easier to make these. Because in my opinion AI for creative process is neither bad or good, it's all about how you use it.
Mostly5
2024-10-04 17:14:16 +0000 UTCNot this type it ain't. Nor with giant databases full of people's likenesses taken and used without their permission, credit, or payment. Diluting all technology to "AI" is obfuscation at best.
Robert Louis Stoll
2024-10-04 17:13:26 +0000 UTCYou do know that game developers and Hollywood have been using AI for special effects and other things for years now even before it became readily available to the public
Mostly5
2024-10-04 17:12:07 +0000 UTCGiven you ALSO use pictures and video, it honestly kind of perturbing. Given the often times adult nature of your work, using "tools" that wholesale use people's likenesses without them even knowing (let alone crediting, paying, or giving them an out,) it's highly immoral to use anything based on these training databases. Let alone should anything slip through that is clearly a specific person that opens you up to possible deletion/legal action. You can't even copyright anything you make using these processes, so it's not even conducive to the act of selling any of your work on subscription. Do not make this mistake; you've shown yourself capable of doing so without, and frankly it'd be a slap to the artists who produced to works you're remixing to send it through some sort of filter.
Robert Louis Stoll
2024-10-04 16:23:06 +0000 UTCSupported you for some time now, but if you use AI I won't. Ecologically it's damaging, most commercial uses use stolen works, and it doesn't even look good. I could write essays on the topic frankly, but at the end of the day it shouldn't be necessary to convince you to do your own work. I'm not paying for you to prompt something into a program owned by some oil salesman stealing automaton.
Robert Louis Stoll
2024-10-04 16:15:10 +0000 UTCWhat AI do you use?
Nelso
2024-10-04 16:01:40 +0000 UTC
